https://libguides.bigbend.edu/c.php?g=1143978&p=8347244

I just added it and it only doubled the old meetings, doesn't add the new meetings going forward?

Same, still says 9/30

I just copy the old invites...

https://slcny.libguides.com/c.php?g=986218&p=7623203

https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/kDKKyiB88FQwGdUzL4vSrMGG

600 is for personal names. 650 is for topics. 651 is for places.

Can you explain again which items this would change the display for?

610 is for names of organizations

ok thank you

It probably depends on your end goal. Are you adding them to improve searchability, or are you replacing them to remove offensive wording from display?

tWhoHowecide what is offensive and chooses the replacement that they deem acceptable? I wonder how libraries are handling this? Involve the DEI director or have a committee?

M Zoom/chat is acting up.

Plus the fact that Conress is blocking the Library of Congress from doing their job

Ohio is also discussing and has given recommendations: https://www.ohiolink.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/Guidelines_for_Outdated_Terms_FINAL.pdf

I wonder if we have any shared catalog (between SBCTC institutions) ideas on the horizon, how or if or should there be "coordination" between which institutions implemented these normalization rules and which did not. That could get tricky from a search point of view if different Alma instances had different rules in a blended catalog environment. Probably not relevant just now, but something for future ideas.

Jennifer the idea of a WACTCLC shared catalog has dropped by the wayside for now. But that is a good point, if that every changes.

Because Orbis Cascade has a shared Network Zone catalog, they have the rule that bib records can't vary from the record that appears in the WorldCat database (but they do allow for local fields in the Institution Zone). .

Because of the Network Zone, Orbis Cascade has to rely on scripting for Primo displays for each individual institution

If the updated subject heading is in the MARC record for that ProQuest Research article, does that mean ProQuest is adding that now to their own records?

I've got to run to another meeting. Have a good week!

I have to head out. Thanks, all!

Thanks, all!

Thanks this is useful, and good timing, as our other librarian was just asking me about this issue.

I'll do more experimenting in our catalog too!

thanks - and Wade, I posted a question on the listserv..